Legal Opinion

Burns v. Pennsylvania R. R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1928No. Appeal, 104PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

On the morning of August 19, 1925, as the plaintiff, Arrappa M. Burns, was about to board an accommodation train, just as it was coming to a stop at Shadyside station, she was struck and injured by a dog that jumped from the platform of one of the coaches. This suit brought by her against the railroad company to recover for the injuries thus sustained, resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff and defendant has appealed.

The record discloses no sufficient evidence to sustain the recovery. There was no defect in the means of transportation or manner of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Phila. & Reading R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Burns v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Wood v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Ginn v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Fleming v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sierocinski v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  2. Dupont v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Gilbert v. Korvette's, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API