Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Korvette's, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1972No. Appeals, Nos. 1129 and 1646PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

We are presented on appeal with the question of whether either or both a department store-operator of an escalator and the company which manufactures and services said instrumentality may be held liable under the theory of res ipsa loquitur to a plaintiff who is injured while a passenger on the escalator in defendant’s store.

This appeal arises from an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by Crestón Gilbert, then a minor under the age of four, on August 20, 1960, while in the store of E. J. Korvette, Inc. The minor-plaintiff, who was wearing high sneakers or…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Evans v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. MacDougall v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Zahniser v. Pennsylvania Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. MacDonald v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Brown v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. Johnson v. Otis Elevator Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Johns Hopkins Hospital v. CorreiaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Banet v. City of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API