Legal Opinion
Ihm v. CRAWFORD & COMPANY
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1998No. S-96-237PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.
INTRODUCTION
The appellant, Bruce A. Ihm, was injured while working for Millar Elevator Service Company (Millar Elevator). Appellee Zurich Insurance Company (Zurich) is Millar Elevator’s workers’ compensation insurance carrier, and appellee Crawford & Company is Zurich’s agent for processing and administering workers’ compensation claims. Ihm received treatment and underwent various surgeries as a result of his compensable injuries. During the course of his treatment, Ihm developed reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Unable to obtain adequate medical treatment in Nebraska for the condition, Ihm…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. v. HollandMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Hayes v. Aetna Fire UnderwritersMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Hough v. Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. DeyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. RuttigerTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- DeOliveira v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Estate of Teague v. Crossroads Co-op Assn.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- Jackson v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1998
- Graske v. Auto-Owners InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.