Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Travelers Insurance
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided December 24, 1998No. 4:98-cv-90151PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS, IN PART, DENYING IN PART
PRATT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs Roger and Phoebe Jackson originally filed their Complaint in the Iowa District Court for Polk County alleging insurance bad faith, loss of consortium, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and a claim for punitive damages against Defendants Travelers Insurance, et al. (“Travelers"), based on Defendants’ handling of a workers’ compensation claim filed by Mr. Jackson. Defendants removed the case to…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Weitz Co. v. Lexington InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2013
- Cole v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2006
- Linden v. CNH AMERICA LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2010
- (PC) Pilcher v. DelaneyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Bills v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.--SEE 47 DISMISSING COUNTS II AND III AND 39 DISMISSING COUNT IVDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.