Legal Opinion

Pete's Mountain Homeowners Ass'n v. Clackamas County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 1, 2009No. 2008065; A140272PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

In this land use case, petitioners obtained waivers of applicable land use laws under Ballot Measure 37 (2004). With those waivers in hand, they then applied with the county to construct a subdivision in an area zoned for agricultural and forest use. While their application was pending, the voters enacted Ballot Measure 49 (2007), which essentially supersedes Measure 37 and renders Measure 37 waivers without legal effect. The question in this case is the effect of the enactment of Measure 49 on petitioners’ application. Petitioners argue that ORS 215.427(3)(a), commonly known as the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Anthony v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Biggerstaff v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Damman v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF YAMHILL COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Bertsch v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State Ex Rel. English v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API