King v. King

[Special Justice Garvín

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This cause turns upon the application, construction and effect of Section 2193 of the Code of 185S, carried into Shannon’s Annotated Code as Section 3925 and reading as follows:

“A child born after the making of a will, either before ox after the death of the testator, not provided fox 'nor disinherited, but only pretermitted in such will, and not provided for by settlement made by the testator in his lifetime, shall succeed to the same portion of the 'testator’s estate as if he had died intestate.”

The bill in the canse prays for a sale…