Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Hager

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1899PublishedCited by 26 opinions

FROM TROUSDALE. Appeal from Chancery Court of Trousdale County. J. S. Cribble, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtWilees, J.

The bill in this case is filed to assert the right of complainants to a certain parcel of land in Hartsville, now in possession of and claimed by defendant. The only defense insisted on in this Court is that the defendant is an innocent purchaser. He was so held by the Chancellor and the Court of Chancery Appeals, and the appeal to this Court is by the complainants, who are the only heirs at law of Mrs. Martha Reeves, and claim by descent from her. The defendant claims as innocent purchaser from A. S. Reeves, Si'., the husband of Mrs. Martha Reeves, who held under a will of his former wife.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fallon v. ChidesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  2. Steele v. RennTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Hughes v. BurrissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  4. Thompson v. SamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Foulke v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Rogers v. ColvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State v. LancasterTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Petty v. CallTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re Estate of EdenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  5. Green v. HigdonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API