Legal Opinion

Keith v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 4, 1977No. 31601PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

The trial court sustained a motion to suppress the evidence seized during a search with a warrant when the state refused to reveal the identity of its informer for an in camera inquiry into probable cause for the issuance of the warrant. The Court of Appeals held that the trial court erred in failing to hold a hearing and exercise its discretion to decide if the informer’s name was required. State v. Keith, 139 Ga. App. 399 (228 SE2d 332) (1976). We granted certiorari to consider whether the court could compel the state to reveal its informer or to disclose the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Thornton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Shaner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Grimes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. State v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API