Philos Technologies, Inc. v. Philos & D, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
This memorandum opinion and order is the final chapter at the District Court level of this lengthy legal drama, although the appeal on the merits has been pending for a goodly period.1 This chapter ends with an assessment of fees and expenses properly awarded to Philos & D, Don-Hee Park and Jaehee Park (collectively “Philos & D”) as a sanction imposed against plaintiff Philos Technologies, Inc. (“Philos Tech”).
This Court’s September 25, 2012 findings of fact and conclusions of law (“Findings and Conclusions,” Dkt. 116)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Edsel Gusman, Cross-Appellant v. Unisys Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- In the Matter Of: Synthroid Marketing LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Jardien v. Winston Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rosenow v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025