Legal Opinion

Mechtensimer v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 11, 1993No. Record 921296PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell

In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court had jurisdiction to adjudicate an action in which the defendant filed responsive pleadings to an amended motion for judgment even though the plaintiff failed to obtain leave of court before filing the amended pleading.

On June 21, 1990, Dr. Earl C. Mechtensimer filed a motion for judgment against Wesley Wilson and others, alleging that they had committed certain tortious acts against him arising out of an employment relationship. This motion for judgment was not served on Wilson.

Mechtensimer filed an amended motion for judgment on May 31,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis Bakery, Inc. v. DozierSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  2. Atlantic & Danville R. R. Co. v. PeakeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Thomas W. Mallory, Jr. v. David K. Smith, Warden James S. Gilmore, Iii, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  2. Bowie v. MurphySupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  3. Graham v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  4. Ahari v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  5. Thornton v. GlazerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API