Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Glazer

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 21, 2006No. 051612PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY Justice DONALD W. LEMONS.

In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court erred in its refusal to admit certain deposition testimony pursuant to Rule 4:7 and whether the trial court erred in its refusal of a jury instruction regarding adverse witness testimony.

I. Facts and Proceedings Below

Samuel H. Thornton, Jr. ("Thornton") sought treatment from Dr. Limor Glazer, D.P.M. ("Glazer"), a podiatrist, for severe foot pain and deformity. Glazer diagnosed several problems afflicting both of Thornton's feet, and ultimately performed two surgeries on Thornton. First, she operated on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Economopoulos v. KolaitisSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  2. Weddle, Administratrix v. DraperSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
  3. Henning v. ThomasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  4. Horne v. MilgrimSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  5. King v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Graham v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  2. David Michael Hodges v. Donna Marie HodgesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
  3. PNC Bank, N.A. v. YenFairfax County Circuit Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API