Legal Opinion

Ahari v. Morrison

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 11, 2008No. Record 070146PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY Justice CYNTHIA D. KINSER.

In this appeal, we determine whether the operative filing date of an amended complaint is the date on which a motion for leave to amend is filed or the date on which a trial court enters an order granting leave to amend. Because Rule 1:8 requires leave of court to amend any pleading after it is filed, we conclude that the circuit court did not err by holding that an amended complaint is not deemed filed, and is thus without legal efficacy, until a trial court grants leave to amend.

Marissa Ahari, as administrator and representative of the estate of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mendenhall v. Douglas L. Cooper, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  2. Neff v. GarrardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  3. Westgate v. Philip Richardson Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  4. Bowie v. MurphySupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  5. Mechtensimer v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Conger v. BarrettSupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  2. Hawthorne v. VanMarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  3. Nichols Const. v. Virginia MacHine ToolSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  4. Addison v. JurgelskySupreme Court of Virginia · 2011
  5. Estate of James v. PeytonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API