Legal Opinion
State v. Insua
Montana Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 2004No. 01-105PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 Albert Insua (Insua) appeals from the judgment entered by the Twenty-First Judicial District, Ravalli County, following his conviction of one count of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of sexual assault. We affirm.
¶2 We restate the issues on appeal as follows:
¶3 1. Whether the District Court adequately advised Insua of the dangers of representing himself.
¶4 2. Whether the District Court abused its discretion by limiting Insua’s cross-examination, closing argument, and the calling of witnesses.
¶5 3. Whether the District Court admitted prejudicial evidence of other crimes.
FA…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State v. Van KirkMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. MattMontana Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. SnellMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. SageMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BowmanMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HardmanMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Juan Perez-Gonzalez v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.