Cotto Waxo Company v. Charles W. Williams, as Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
This is a dormant Commerce Clause ease. Cotto Waxo challenges a Minnesota law prohibiting the sale of petroleum-based sweeping compounds. The district court held that the local benefits of the law outweigh the law’s burden on interstate commerce, and granted summary judgment in favor of the state. We reverse.
I. BACKGROUND
In 1992, the Minnesota legislature enacted a statute (the Act) prohibiting the sale of petroleum-based sweeping compounds. 1 The Act granted enforcement powers to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
Before passage of the Act, Cotto Waxo sold…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Maine v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Freedom Holdings Inc. v. SpitzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America v. ConcannonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Rural Water System 1 v. City of Sioux CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
- Wine & Spirits Retailers, Inc. v. Rhode IslandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.