Legal Opinion

Parish v. Bainum

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1923No. 13882PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

The following contract was executed on the date and by the persons named therein:

“This contract, made and entered into this 21st day of February, 1906, by and between Noah C. Bainum and Francis M. Parish, of Carmi, Illinois, and J. S. Sweeney, of Mt. Carmel, Illinois, and Charles A. Bainum, of Bicknell, Indiana, for the benefit of all the said parties:
"Witnesseth: That Noah C. Bainum has, for and on behalf of all the parties hereto, recently contracted to purchase of Bernard S. Landes, of Mt. Carmel, Illinois, certain real estate owned by said Landes at Mt. Carmel, Illinois, consisting of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Estate of CopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Fougner v. First National Bank of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Morrison v. Austin State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Ligare v. PeacockIllinois Supreme Court · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ingram v. DeereTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Rizzo v. RizzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Peck v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Ditis v. Ahlvin Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Harmon v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API