Legal Opinion

Ball v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 26, 1987No. 86-179PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The petitioner, William K. Ball, is a licensed attorney from Monticello, Arkansas. He was appointed by Judge Paul Roberts to represent Mary McKinley in a criminal case in Drew County, Arkansas. Ball filed a motion to void the appointment on two grounds. First, he relied on Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-2419 (Supp. 1985) which provides in pertinent part:

An attorney shall not be so appointed by a court if the attorney certifies to the court in writing, that he or she has not attended or taken a prescribed course in criminal law in an accredited school of law within twenty-five…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Henderson v. DudleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Weems v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. McConnell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  5. Bridges v. Arkansas Motor Coaches, Ltd., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Long v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  2. In Re Guidelines for Child Support Enf.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Luebbers v. Money Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. State v. LesterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Ligon v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API