Legal Opinion
Woodland v. District Council 20
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 26, 2001No. 99-CV-529PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Appellant Woodland appeals from the trial court’s order granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment. On appeal, Mr. Woodland argues that summary judgment should not have been granted because there were genuine issues of material fact concerning (1) his claim of disability under the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C.Code § 1-2501 et seq. (1999), and (2) his claim that appellees failed to comply with the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. (1994). With respect to the DCHRA claim, we affirm. With respect to the FMLA claim,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dutcher v. Ingalls ShipbuildingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Spurlock v. NynexDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1996
- Blackman v. Visiting Nurses Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- American University v. District of Columbia Commission on Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Musa v. Continental Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Murray v. Wells Fargo Home MortgageDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Kotsch v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Griffin v. Acacia Life InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- HAVILAH REAL PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC v. VLK, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Miller-McGee v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.