State v. Stull

Defendant petitions for review of our affirmance of the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. We treat the petition as one for reconsideration. ORAP 9.15(1).

Defendant moved to suppress evidence obtained by a search conducted pursuant to a warrant. He argued that, because the affidavit supporting the warrant does not show that the confidential informant (Cl) was credible or her information reliable, it did not establish probable cause. ORS 133.545(4); State v. Carlile, 290 Or 161, 164, 619 P2d 1280 (1980). The trial court found that the fruits of the search conducted pursuant to the…