Legal Opinion
Pate v. Federated Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 5, 1984No. 68571PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Judge.
In February of 1980, appellant-insured was injured in an automobile collision. He received $5,000 in basic no-fault benefits from the appellee-insurer.
On April 13, 1983, appellant’s counsel sent a letter to appellee regarding the collision of February 1980. In this letter, appellant’s counsel cited Flewellen v. Atlanta Cas. Co., 250 Ga. 709 (300 SE2d 673) (1983) and Jones v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 156 Ga. App. 230 (274 SE2d 623) (1980). The letter continued: “Under the holding of these cases, please provide my client’s application for insurance covering the time period…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Flewellen v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Enfinger v. International Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Stafford v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Wilson v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
3Cited by2 opinions
- Federated Mutual Insurance v. PateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Pate v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985