Legal Opinion

Federated Mutual Insurance v. Pate

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1985No. 41901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Weltner, Justice.

Certiorari was granted to review Division 2 of the opinion of the Court of Appeals in Pate v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co., 173 Ga. App. 163 (325 SE2d 831) (1984), which held that a question of fact existed as to whether an insurance company had contracted to provide optional no-fault coverage to a policyholder, notwithstanding the inapplicability of Flewellen v. Atlanta Cas. Co., 250 Ga. 709 (300 SE2d 673) (1983). A recitation of fact appears in the opinion of the Court of Appeals.

We agree with the dissenting Court of Appeals judges that an essential element of the purported…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Flewellen v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Peachtree on Peachtree Investors, Ltd. v. Reed Drug Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Indian Trail Village, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Pate v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pate v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API