Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Medical Research Foundation

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 2, 1980No. 78-1883, CA 16813PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P.J.

Claimant appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) which held that claimant’s occupational disease claim was not timely filed. The referee had found that claimant gave the employer actual notice of the claim and that the claim was compensable. Employer contends that the claim was not timely and in the alternative, if timely filed, it is not compensable. The Board did not address the compensability issue in its order.

ORS 656.807 provides, in relevant part:

"(1) * * * [A]ll occupational disease claims shall be void unless a claim is filed with the * * * direct…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. James v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Satterfield v. STATE COMPENSATION DEPARTMENTCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. Vandre v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Hayes-Godt v. Scott Wetzel ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Raifsnider v. Caveman Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API