Legal Opinion

People v. Meidell

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 1963No. Crim. 4248PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AGEE, J.-

The People appeal from an order setting aside the forfeiture of defendant's bail. Such an order is appealable (People v. Wilcox (1960) 53 Cal.2d 651, 654-655 [2 CaI.Rptr. 754, 349 P.2d 522]).

Defendant has not filed any brief and therefore we accept as true the statement of facts in the appellant’s opening brief. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 17(b) * .)

Defendant had been charged with three violations of section 288 of the Penal Code. He posted bail of $2,625 by a bond issued by a bonding company and was then released from custody.

After certain proceedings not pertinent herein, defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. DoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. United Bonding InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. People v. RolleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. People v. PughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. County of Los Angeles v. Amwest Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. People v. National Automobile & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API