Legal Opinion
Conklin v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 28, 2023No. 3:20-cv-01712Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL T. CONKLIN, JR., Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-1712 V. : (JUDGE MANNION) HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR : COMPANY GROUP, LLC, Defendant. : MEMORANDUM Motorcycles, at their most basic level, are designed and manufactured to accelerate and to brake. Plaintiff Michael Conklin was riding his Harley-Davidson motorcycle one day and it failed to perform the latter function, causing him injuries. Conklin believes this malfunction was due to a failure in the design or manufacture of the motorcycle’s clutch system. His expert agrees.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.