Legal Opinion

City Bank & Trust Co. v. Atwood

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1917No. Docket No. 96PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Montcalm; Davis, J. Assumpsit by the City Bank & Trust Company against Jennie Atwood upon a promissory note. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error. '

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiff brought this action in the circuit court of Montcalm county upon a promissory note given by defendant to it, dated at Mobile, Ala., April 20, 1907, payable on demand at plaintiff’s bank in Mobile. The note itself is in customary form, followed by a supplemental provision pledging as collateral to it 600 shares of the Mann Lumber Company, a corporation. The declaration is upon the common counts in assumpsit with a copy of the note made a part of the declaration.

Defendant pleaded the general issue with special notice of the defense that she was a married woman and the note was given…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Auditor General v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. De Vries v. ConklinMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. NicholasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Scott v. TaulSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  5. Sample v. GuyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paepcke v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Ferrell v. EllingMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Pflueger v. Broadway Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  4. J. S. Judge & Co. v. LilleyPennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API