Legal Opinion

Smith v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority

Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court

Decided September 19, 2006No. GDTC-T-05-130-FOEPublished

1Opinion of the Court

BACKGROUND

EAGAN, Judge.

The plaintiff, Marilyn Smith, filed a complaint, alleging that she was injured when she slipped on an accumulation of water in the area of the pool and spa in the hotel at the Mohegan Sun Casino. Paragraph 5(e) alleges that defendant:

knew or should have known of numerous other incidents in which other patrons were injured as a result of wet floors, but failed to use reasonable care to prevent injuries to its patrons and, in particular, the plaintiff.

The defendant claims that these allegations are irrelevant to plaintiffs claim of negligence, as well as being vague and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Waters v. AutuoriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Royce v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API