Legal Opinion

Payne v. Monroe

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 14, 1921No. 12485PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal; from Chatham superior court — Judge Meldrim. April 6, 1921. .

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. The petition, even before amendment, did not fail to set forth a cause of action, and was therefore not subject to the general demurrer, since it does not appear that the demurrage charges, which it is alleged the defendant unlawfully collected, accrued by virtue of any contract of shipment, and since, under the rules of the railroad commission, fixing and prescribing a schedule of demurrage rates, it is also provided, as a prerequisite to such a charge, that the delivering carrier shall have given notice to the consignee of the arrival of the freight at the point of destination, and since…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Hines v. McCookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Payne v. LyonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. New Jersey Shipbuilding & Dredging Co. v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923
  3. Davis v. McMillianCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  4. Bostwick v. Director General of RailroadsMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Davis v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API