Davis v. McMillian
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Eeid. August 24, 1921. Certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. The Federal control of railroads, under the acts of Congress and the proclamations and orders of the President of the United States and the Director General of Railroads, “while effecting a consolidation of the physical control of the different transportation systems, did not effect a consolidation of the individual companies, so far as their respective legal rights and liabilities were concerned.” Payne v. Monroe, 28 Ga. App. 6 (110 S. E. 34); Davis v. Hawkins, 28 Ga. App. 203 (110 S. E. 500). Section 10 of the act of March 21, 1918 (U. S. Comp. Stat. 1919; § 3115% j), provides that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hines v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Payne v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Hines v. MinorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Hines v. ZellnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Davis v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Dougherty v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
- Davis v. McMillianCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Davis v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923