Legal Opinion

Bostwick v. Director General of Railroads

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1922No. Docket No. 27PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

On March 9, 1918, plaintiff was work*22ing as a brakeman on a train engaged in moving freight cars on the Wabash railroad in Detroit. The train was going west. About the time it reached Clark street the forward car became separated from the tender. The locomotive was equipped with a running-board at each end. The plaintiff, who had been riding in the cab, stepped back and adjusted the coupling. There are three parallel tracks at this point. The Wabash train occupied the north track. Plaintiff stepped off the running board, on the south side, took a few steps and was struck by a Pere Marquette…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. LangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Rutherford v. Union Pac. R.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1919
  4. Peacock v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Payne v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. McLeanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Granquist v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API