Legal Opinion

Zesbaugh, Inc. v. General Steel Fabricating, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1981No. 47302-1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dore, J. —

Petitioner National Association of Credit Management (NACM) held a security interest in assets of General Steel Fabricating, Inc. (General Steel) which became the subject of a garnishment proceeding. NACM sought to protect its interest by intervening in the garnishment procedure. Its complaint in intervention was found defective by the trial court because it was not verified. Intervention was denied. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Zesbaugh, Inc. v. General Steel Fabricating, Inc., 26 Wn. App. 929, 614 P.2d 699 (1980). We reverse.

Plaintiff Zesbaugh obtained a stipulated judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fisch v. MarlerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Snyder v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  3. Boundary Dam Constructors v. Lawco Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. Zesbaugh, Inc. v. General Steel Fabricating, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Spokane Research & Defense Fund v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. SPOKANE RESEARCH FUND v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical Center, PSWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Fisher Bros. Corp. v. Des Moines Sewer Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API