In Re Ward
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, C. J.
Judge Homer Ferguson, sitting as a one-man grand jury, under the authority of 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 17217 et seq. (Stat. Ann. § 28.943 et seq.), committed petitioner Ward for contempt. When called as a witness, petitioner, claiming to stand upon his constitutional rights, reused to answer the following questions:
“1. Did you ever receive any money from the operator of any handbook gambling house in the first police precinct in the city of Detroit, State of Michigan?
‘ ‘ 2. Did you ever collect money from the operator or agent of any handbook in the city of Detroit to permit and allow the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Ex parte SticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- People v. LorentzenMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. DenuylMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re SlatteryMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. SarnoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.