Legal Opinion

In Re Ward

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1940No. Calendar 41,286PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, C. J.

Judge Homer Ferguson, sitting as a one-man grand jury, under the authority of 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 17217 et seq. (Stat. Ann. § 28.943 et seq.), committed petitioner Ward for contempt. When called as a witness, petitioner, claiming to stand upon his constitutional rights, reused to answer the following questions:

“1. Did you ever receive any money from the operator of any handbook gambling house in the first police precinct in the city of Detroit, State of Michigan?

‘ ‘ 2. Did you ever collect money from the operator or agent of any handbook in the city of Detroit to permit and allow the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Ex parte SticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. People v. LorentzenMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. DenuylMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. In Re SlatteryMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. People v. SarnoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API