Legal Opinion
James Hagy v. Demers & Adams
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 16, 2018No. 17-3696PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
David Demers, an attorney, sent a letter on behalf of his client to the attorney for James and Patricia Hagy. The letter indicated that the Hagys would not have to pay the balance on their loan and that the lender would not pursue any other remedies against the Hagys. That seemed like good news for the Hagys. Little did Demers know that this epistle would lead to six years (and counting) of litigation against him and his firm for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Because the complaint failed to identify a cognizable injury traceable to Demers (and his…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Gustav Buchholz v. Meyer Njus Tanick, PACourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Carol Wilding v. DNC Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Brooke Persinger v. Southwest Credit Systems, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Wilbur Macy v. GC Services Ltd. P'shipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.