Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Yates

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 14, 1989No. 2507PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

The principal issue raised by this appeal is whether two convictions for aggravated assault, arising from injuries to two individuals caused by a single blast from a shotgun, should have been deemed to have merged under the common law merger doctrine as applied in Pennsylvania. We find that the offenses did not merge, and affirm the order denying appellant post-conviction relief.

In February 1981, appellant went to Debra Wimes’ apartment armed with a loaded shot gun and engaged in an argument with the occupants of the apartment, including Rosetta Williams, the grandmother of his…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. PetrasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. FrisbieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. WeaklandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrekisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. MobleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API