Clement v. McQuarrie
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents. Interference proceedings between Edward E. Clement and James L. McQuarrie and another. From a decision of the Commissioner of Patents awarding priority to McQuarrie and another, Clement appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
SMYTH, Chief Justice.
Clement complains of a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference proceeding involving semiautomatic telephone systems. The issue consists of 28 counts, of which the following are' examples:
1. In a telephone exchange system, the combination with a number of operators’ connecting circuits, of mechanical line switching mechanism for each connecting circuit adapted to connect said circuit with the desired line, a controller for operating any one of said mechanisms, means for associating said controller with any one of said connecting circuits to operate its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co. v. William R. Thropp & Sons Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
- Selectasine Patents Co. v. Prest-O-Graph Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1920
- Consolidated Bunging Apparatus Co. v. WoerleUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
- Dickinson v. SwinehartCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
- Clement v. RobertsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kane v. SteinmetzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923