Legal Opinion

Kane v. Steinmetz

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 2, 1923No. 1510PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from concurrent decisions of the Patent Office tribunals in an interference proceeding awarding priority of invention to Steinmetz and Standerwick.

The invention relates to turbine-driven dynamos designed primarily to furnish current for headlights on locomotives. One of the problems to he solved was to provide a suitable regulator, which would control the speed of the turbine under the various conditions of use. Of the seven counts of the issue, the first sufficiently illustrates the invention, as follows:

“1. A generator connected to supply energy to a variable…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clement v. McQuarrieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Buono v. Yankee Maid Dress Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1934
  2. Standerwick v. KaneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API