Fetzer v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance
North Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentMaring, Justice
[¶ 16] I respectfully dissent. I would adopt the positional-risk doctrine and reverse the district court judgment affirming the Administrative Order.
[¶ 17] Before 1977, our statute defined a compensable injury as one arising in the “course of employment.” See Schlenk v. Aerial Contractors, Inc., 268 N.W.2d 466, 469 (N.D.1978). Our legislature amended the definition of a compensable injury in 1977 to “an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of employment.” 1977 N.D. Sess. Laws ch. 579, § 2. Our Court’s interpretation of this amendment, which added the words “out of and,” was…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Whetro v. AwkermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
- Taylor v. Twin City ClubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Milledge v. OaksIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Butler v. SOUTHERN STATES CO-OP., INC.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.