State v. Geer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Ineokmation in tlie police court of the city of New Lon don, charging that the defendant, “ on the 19th day of October, 1889, at the city of New London, unlawfully did receive and have in his possession, with the wrongful and unlawful intent to procure their transportation beyond the limits of this state, certain woodcock, ruffled grouse and quail, killed within this state after the first day of October, 1889.” The case was appealed by the defendant to the Criminal Court of…
Read the full summary
Ineokmation in tlie police court of the city of New Lon don, charging that the defendant, “ on the 19th day of October, 1889, at the city of New London, unlawfully did receive and have in his possession, with the wrongful and unlawful intent to procure their transportation beyond the limits of this state, certain woodcock, ruffled grouse and quail, killed within this state after the first day of October, 1889.” The case was appealed by the defendant to the Criminal Court of Common Pleas of New London County, and in that court he demurred to the information. The court (Crump, ■I.,') overruled…
1Opinion of the CourtSeymour, J.
The General Statutes, § 2530, provide that “ every person who shall buy, sell, expose for sale, or have in his possession for any purpose, or who shall hunt, pursue, kill, destroy, or attempt to kill, any woodcock, quail, ruffled grouse called partridge, or gray squirrel, between the first day of January and the first day of October, the killing or having possession of each bird or squirrel to be deemed a separate offense, * * * shall be fined not more than twenty-five dollars,” etc.
Section 2546 provides that “ no person shall at any time kill any woodcock, ruffled grouse or quail for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Commonwealth v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- State v. SaundersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. RodmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Ross v. CrofuttSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Organ v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
- United States v. ShauverDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1914
- United States v. McCullaghDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.