Legal Opinion
United States v. Shauver
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided May 25, 1914PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Harvey C. Shauver was indicted for a violation of the migratory birds provision of Act March 4, 1913, c. 145, 37 Stat. 847.
1Opinion of the Court
TRIEBER, District Judge.
The defendant demurs to the indictment in this cause, which charges him with a violation of that part of the Appropriation Act for the Department of Agriculture, approved March 4, 1913 (37 Stat. 828, 847, c. 145), known as the “migratory birds” provision, and the regulations made by the Department of Agriculture in pursuance thereof, and which have been approved by the President. That provision reads:
“All wild geese, wild swans, brant, wild ducks, snipe, plover, woodcock, rail, wild pigeons, and all other migratory game and insectivorous birds which in their northern…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. SteffensSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Martin v. Lessee of WaddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Morris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Cochrane v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- United States v. McCullaghDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1915
- Organized Village of Kake v. EganDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1959
- Young v. Kellex CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.