United Food & Commercial Workers, Local Union 1099 v. City of Sidney
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANT SHELBY COUNTY SHERIFF (DOC. # 25); DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OF DEFENDANT CITY OF SIDNEY (DOC. #26); JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS; TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, Chief Judge.
In February, 2000, the Sidney City Council agreed to rezone certain parcels of real estate, in order to permit the construction of a Wal-Mart store. The Plaintiffs, Local Union 1099 of the United Food and Commercial Workers (“Local 1099”) and twelve of its members, opposed that rezoning. As…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1099 v. City Of SidneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1099 v. City of SidneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Local 1099 v. SidneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1099 v. City of SidneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004