United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1099 v. City of Sidney
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1099 (“Local 1099”) and twelve of its members, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 against defendants-appellees after they were prohibited from soliciting signatures for a referendum petition outside six polling places on election day in Sidney, Ohio. These polling places included four public schools, the local Y.M.C.A., and a church. At each location, members of Local 1099 attempted to solicit signatures in areas on school or private property that were outside of the areas that had…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1099 v. City Of SidneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004