Legal Opinion

United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1099 v. City of Sidney

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 24, 2004No. 02-3415UnknownCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1099 (“Local 1099”) and twelve of its members, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 against defendants-appellees after they were prohibited from soliciting signatures for a referendum petition outside six polling places on election day in Sidney, Ohio. These polling places included four public schools, the local Y.M.C.A., and a church. At each location, members of Local 1099 attempted to solicit signatures in areas on school or private property that were outside of the areas that had…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1099 v. City Of SidneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API