Legal Opinion

United States v. Black Spotted Horse

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided September 27, 2000No. CR 00-30028-RHBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

BATTEY, District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the above-entitled case was referred to Magistrate Judge Mark A. Moreno. On August 31, 2000, Magistrate Judge Moreno issued his findings and recommendations as to defendant’s motion to suppress statements made on September 20, 1999, and December 8, 1999. Magistrate Judge Moreno recommended that defendant’s motion be denied.

The standard of review of a magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations is de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Defendant has ten days to file objections to the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Benjamin Damron - DissentingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  2. United States v. DuprisDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API