City of Concord v. State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1DissentConboy, J.
Because, in my view, section 52 contravenes the plain language of Part I, Article 28-a, I would hold that section 52 constitutes an unconstitutional unfunded mandate.
Article 28-a provides:
The state shall not mandate or assign any new, expanded or modified programs or responsibilities to any political subdivision in such a way as to necessitate additional local expenditures by the political subdivision unless such programs or responsibilities are fully funded by the state or unless such programs or responsibilities are approved for funding by a vote of the local legislative body of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New Hampshire Municipal Trust Workers' Compensation Fund v. FlynnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Judicial Retirement Plan v. SEC. of StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- New Hampshire Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.