Legal Opinion
Judicial Retirement Plan v. SEC. of State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 27, 2010No. 2009-621PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The defendant, the Secretary of State (State), appeals an order of the Superior Court (Nicolosi, J.) enjoining the enforcement of the Sudan Divestment Act. We reverse and remand.
The record reflects the following facts. The plaintiff, New Hampshire Judicial Retirement Plan (Judicial Plan), and the intervenor, New Hampshire Retirement System (NHRS) (retirement systems, collectively), are “defined pension benefit plans,” which invest and manage funds held by the State pursuant to RSA chapter 100-C (Supp. 2009) and RSA chapter 100-A (2001 & Supp. 2009). Each eligible retiree receives a specified…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Lake County v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Rutanen v. BaylisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Baines v. New Hampshire Senate PresidentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Irish v. GimbelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bill Duncan & a. v. State of New Hampshire & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- New Hampshire Health Care Ass'n v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State Employees' Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. PloofSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Union Leader Corp. v. New Hampshire Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.