Legal Opinion
Maestas v. Day & Zimmerman, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 4, 2012No. 10-2280PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, officers in a private security force that protects Los Alamos National Laboratory, contend that their employer Day and Zimmerman, LLC, and SOC, LLC, (collectively “SOC”) improperly classified them as exempt employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Ruling on their contentions, the district court concluded that all plaintiffs were exempt executive employees and granted summary judgment to SOC.
The parties disagree over which of plaintiffs’ job duties is “primary,” a determination essential to the classification of their…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shockley v. City of Newport NewsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Rodriguez v. Whiting Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Mullins v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ramos v. Baldor Specialty Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Ellis v. J.R.'s Country Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Radtke v. Lifecare Management PartnersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Fiore v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Kadden v. Visualex, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.