Legal Opinion

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 31, 2011No. Nos. 09-265C, 09-882CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

SMITH, Senior Judge.

During World War II, the United States required massive quantities of 100-octane aviation gasoline (“avgas”) for use in airplane engines. The Government considered avgas to be a “superfuel” that allowed airplanes to fly with more power, speed, quicker take-off, and was essential to victory in combat. The critical need for avgas prompted the Government to order oil refineries to maximize its production, which resulted in the Government contracting with Plaintiffs Baytown and Baton Rouge refineries for the production and supply of avgas.

The Baytown and Baton…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Shell Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Company v. the United States 06-141c & 0United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
  3. Exxon Mobil Corporation v. the United States 09-265c &United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  4. Exxon Mobil Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API