Legal Opinion
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. the United States 09-265c &
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 16, 2013No. Case 09-265C & 09-882CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
28 U.S.C. § 455(a), 28 U.SC. § 455(a), Shell Oil v. United States, 672 F.3d 1283 (Fed.Cir.2012), Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 114 S.Ct. 1147, 127 L.Ed.2d 474 (1994), In re Kansas Public Retirement System, 85 F.3d 1353 (8th Cir.1996)
OPINION and ORDER
SMITH, Senior Judge.
The Government seeks reassignment of two consolidated cases involving the reimbursement of environmental cleanup costs near ExxonMobil’s facilities in Baton Rouge, Louisiana and Baytown, Texas. Shell, a related ease, was reassigned to Judge Wheeler based on a financial conflict of interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re Kansas Public Employees Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- New York City Housing Development Corporation v. William T. Hart, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Orchestrate HR, Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022