Legal Opinion
EAC Engineering, Division of the East Asiatic Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 24, 1985No. Court 82-1-00096PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RE, Chief Judge:
The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain merchandise imported from the Federal Republic of Germany, and described on the customs invoices as “spark detection systems.”
The parties are before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. The merchandise was classified by the Customs Service as “optical instruments” under item 712.05 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS). Consequently, the merchandise was assessed with duty of 25 per centum ad valorem.
Plaintiff protests this classification…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Celestaire, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Eac Engineering, Div. of East Asiatic Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- ADC Telecomms., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- EAC Engineering Division of the East Asiatic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986