Legal Opinion
Chambers v. Whirlpool Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 11, 2016No. Case No. CV 11-1733 FMO (JCGx)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES AND EXPENSES
Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge
Having reviewed and considered all the briefing filed with respect to the parties’ Joint Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement (Dkt. 254, “Final Approval Motion”) and plaintiffs’ Motion for Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses and for Service Awards for Plaintiffs (Dkt. 218, “Fees Motion”), as well as the oral argument presented during the final approval hearing on August 25, 2016, the court concludes as follows.
*883INTRODUC…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Steve Chambers v. Whirlpool Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Anderson v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
- BRADLEY v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
- Cooper v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
- Corzine v. Maytag CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.