Legal Opinion
Corzine v. Maytag Corporation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 31, 2019No. 5:15-cv-05764Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 JULIE CORZINE, Case No. 15-cv-05764-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING (1) CLASS’S MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 9 v. SETTLEMENT AND (2) CLASS’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, 10 WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, COSTS, AND SERVICE AWARD 11 Defendant. [Re: ECF 129; 131] 12 13 Plaintiff Julie Corzine (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Whirlpool Corporation (“Whirlpool” or 14 “Defendant”) have entered into a Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims 15 (“Settlement Agreement” or “Settlement”) regarding a defect in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.