Legal Opinion

Walton v. Clark & Washington, P.C.

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided May 21, 2012No. 8:09-mp-00010-MGWPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION DETERMINING THAT CLARK & WASHINGTON’S TWO-CONTRACT PROCEDURE DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH THE COURT’S JULY 12, 2011 MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

MICHAEL G. WILLIAMSON, Bankruptcy Judge.

This Court previously ruled in this miscellaneous proceeding that Clark & Wash ington was prohibited from accepting postdated checks as a prepetition retainer for postpetition services to be provided to their consumer clients. 2 Clark & Washington now has its clients execute two separate agreements: one for prepetition services and another for postpetition services. The agreement for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Albert Bethea v. Robert J. Adams & Associates Law Offices of Melvin James Kaplan and Zalutsky & Pinski, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Walton v. Clark & Washington, P.C.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2011

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re GomesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2018
  2. Brett Jason HazlettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2019
  3. Chanda S. CarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
  4. Charles Pernell Prophet and Shirley Ann ProphetUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
  5. Charmeen L McfarlandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API