Walton v. Clark & Washington, P.C.
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION DETERMINING THAT CLARK & WASHINGTON’S TWO-CONTRACT PROCEDURE DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH THE COURT’S JULY 12, 2011 MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
MICHAEL G. WILLIAMSON, Bankruptcy Judge.
This Court previously ruled in this miscellaneous proceeding that Clark & Wash ington was prohibited from accepting postdated checks as a prepetition retainer for postpetition services to be provided to their consumer clients. 2 Clark & Washington now has its clients execute two separate agreements: one for prepetition services and another for postpetition services. The agreement for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Albert Bethea v. Robert J. Adams & Associates Law Offices of Melvin James Kaplan and Zalutsky & Pinski, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Walton v. Clark & Washington, P.C.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re GomesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2018
- Brett Jason HazlettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2019
- Chanda S. CarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Charles Pernell Prophet and Shirley Ann ProphetUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- Charmeen L McfarlandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.