Legal Opinion

Albert Bethea v. Robert J. Adams & Associates Law Offices of Melvin James Kaplan and Zalutsky & Pinski, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 17, 2003No. 03-1303PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

Three debtors in bankruptcy hired lawyers before filing their petitions. Each agreed to a retainer that would cover the legal services entailed in preparing and prosecuting the proceedings. Unlike most retainers, however, these were to be paid over time — some installments before the petition was filed, others thereafter. The lawyers performed as promised: all three debtors received their discharges, and the cases were closed. When the lawyers continued to collect the unpaid installments, the three debtors (with the assistance of new counsel) commenced adversary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Rinaldi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Lawrence Ex Rel. Lawrence v. ChaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. In re Kmart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Allan J. Rittenhouse v. Saul Eisen, U.S. TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. John Maier, III v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. In Re: John Fickling, Debtor. John Fickling, Debtor-Appellee v. Flower, Medalie & Markowitz, Esqs.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Deandre EnochCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API